The Demise of CLA

Today the members of the Canadian Library Association (CLA) voted overwhelmingly to disband the organization. I’m a member of the Executive Committee of CLA that moved the motion to do this.

Canadian Library AssociationIn many ways it’s a sad day. CLA has been a voice for libraries since 1946 and for many, me included, it has been a tremendous source of professional engagement (I’ve been a member since 1976).

But CLA has declined in relevance and value. A lack of faith in the association (for a variety of reasons) lead to declining memberships and diminished revenues. The vibrant CLA of the past had become an unsustainable organization unable to meet member, and prospective member, needs. It was time for it to go.

In many other ways, however, today is a very exciting and important day because it clears the way for a new vehicle to act as the national voice of libraries: the proposed Canadian Federation of Library Associations.

Many national and regional library associations came together over that past year or more to craft a new organization. It was extremely difficult work. The resulting proposal is not CLA revised or revisited but a new start with new people and a new vision of how to proceed.

It has been easy for some to snark on the sidelines and disparage CLA. I have been impressed by those who had similar reservations about CLA but were prepared to put in the hard work to find a new solution.

The Federation model isn’t perfect. There will be substantial challenges. But the need for a national voice for libraries was broadly and vocally supported.

CLA is over. The Federation is not CLA. It’s time to move on.

My sadness about the demise of CLA is more than tempered by the excitement of a new way forward; a way that will be shaped by those who want to be involved and want to make a difference.

One of the members at the Special General Meeting where CLA was dissolved made a passionate plea for the importance of libraries in underserved communities. We as a library community have lots of work to do to address those and many other needs.

I urge you to follow the work of the Federation and to participate in it through one or more of the many library associations who form the organization. It is our voice to have or to lose.


Posted in Librarianship, Libraries | 6 Comments

The #StationaryCrew Project (Why I Love My Job)

I teach in Guelph’s First Year Seminar program. It is by any measure, too much fun. How could it not be: small class size, interdisciplinary focus, emphasis on discussion and critical thinking, and wonderful students.

As good as it has been over the past number of years, it is so much better this semester!

Welcome to The #StationaryCrew Project. One of the courses I’m teaching this semester.

For those outside Guelph a bit of context. Installed at the University and the city are a number of statues (and objects) that have become important cultural touchstones. They include a bear, a cannon, a gryphon, a pile of garbage (!), John Galt, John McCrae, a blacksmith, and a family. Strange crew.

The #StationaryCrew

The #StationaryCrew

Let’s call these things, “icons”. Some are new (installed last year), others date back to the 19th century (and perhaps even earlier). They all have a strong visual impact and fascinating backstories.

And best of all, each of these icons has a presence on Twitter. Not a corporate account simply promoting the statue but someone being the statue, projecting a personae and chatting with others. They even have a hashtag for themselves: #StationaryCrew (hence the title of the course).

Various traditions over the years mean we interact with these icons physically as well as digitally. The cannon (Old Jeremiah) is painted regularly and acts as a focus for free speech on campus. The bear, The Begging Bear, is dressed up in all manner of clothes (my favourite being a full wedding dress). You are supposed to rub the nose of the Gryphon Statue for good luck and shake John Galt‘s hand. Bathing in the fountain around The Family in the Fountain is discouraged (but popular). Where did all this come from?

The most effective learning experiences are those which are done in public, well beyond the classroom. This course will not only get the students out into the community, they will be creating an online resource that will be accessible to everyone. And, of course, all their interactions on Twitter will be part of the digital public record.

Where the students (and the icons) take this course remains to be seen. As it always seems in my courses, it’s the journey that matters more than the destination.

Since we are learning about this in public you can follow us and participate too! Visit our website: The #StationaryCrew Project and follow the course Twitter account:


Posted in StationaryCrew | Leave a comment

Whither the CIO?

Whither the CIO? Bo Wandschneider, CIO at Queen’s University (and full disclosure the Deputy CIO at Guelph when I was CIO), recently posted about the nature and future of the CIO in higher education: “The demise of the Canadian University CIO…?

Bo observed that too many CIOs in Canada were leaving (e.g. going to the private sector or to other areas of the university). He expressed some frustration at the limited vision of institutions regarding IT (e.g. IT is just a cost centre) and suggested that being a CIO in the private sector might be a better option.

CIOs in higher education (HE) come from many backgrounds; there is no standard career path to the role. I have always thought of that an advantage: diversity matters. But it might also lead to questioning the value of the role.

Difficult Questions

Is the CIO role diminished in HE? Does it live up to its “C-level” billing? And if not, who is responsible for this? The CIO, the Provost, the President?

Are universities blind to the transformational possibilities of IT? Is it just a cost centre or does it offer a positive, progressive disruption?

Is the private sector a better place to be a CIO? Is the university sector moribund or stagnant?


Bo thinks part of the solution for some of these woes is collaboration; real, bold, transformational collaboration. He doesn’t see it happening in IT and this hurts the credibility (and influence) of the CIO.

So, what to do? A few modest observations.

CIOs in HE manage a herd of cats (by which I mean their clients). And these cats are as independent as they come. Each client or client group has tremendous autonomy over their area. Bluntly, they want control. Building consensus for collaborative initiatives across units on campus is difficult enough; thinking about it across institutions seems impossible.

While the rest of the IT enabled world is scaling up to take advantage of innovative services and resources (with competitors sharing common infrastructure and services), HE still likes to do things on its own. Local trumps almost every other option.


University administration (read: Presidents, Provosts, VPs, Boards) don’t believe CIOs can deliver on their vision. Blunt I know.

Real collaboration, the kind Bo is calling for, requires opportunity (we have that in spades in IT), vision (I think there’s lots of good thinking in our community), and commitment (and this is where we are lacking). Collaboration is a promise. It requires a willingness to give up a certain amount (perhaps a lot) of autonomy.

CIOs are generally allergic to that. For Presidents, Provosts, etc. its anathema.

When the water starts to dry up the animals at the drinking hole start to look at each other differently. We are (and will continue) experiencing evaporating resources. But when we look at each other we should see partners not prey. We should think first of collaboration not control.

Think Long Term, Act Now

HE IT needs a long term plan that articulates a view of the HE system enabled differently in a collaborative model. Incrementally realize that vision: start new services/applications as collaborations and move legacy apps to a common framework as they become end of life. This does not mean everyone does it the same way; collaborative directions can be more flexible; variations on a theme rather than a single option.

Remember, however, that all collaboration is about mutual self-interest; finding that sweet spot means understanding the balance between the local and the collective. As a result, it must be a coalition of the willing; the perfect (all institutions are part of the collaboration) is the enemy of the good (a critical mass of engaged partners).

The University CIO

I don’t know if the private sector is a better place to be a CIO, and frankly I don’t care. I worked as a CIO in HE not because I thought technology was extraordinary (although I do) or because information is transformational (which it is) but because I’m passionate about the role and value of universities in transforming the world.

If you are a CIO who doesn’t get this, you should probably leave the sector.


The Canadian University Council of CIOs (CUCCIO) is a wonderful organization involving some of the best information technology leaders in the country. They are well positioned to transform HE IT in Canada.

Be bold.

Recognize the power of collaboration.



Posted in HigherEd, IT, Leadership, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Montreal Dec 6, 1989

Montreal Massacre December 6, 1989

Posted in Remembrance | Comments Off on Montreal Dec 6, 1989

Janet Bannister and The Derry Lecture

Janet Bannister is a remarkable person. She virtually (pun intended) created online shopping with Kijiji (and took it global) and has held technology leadership roles in some of the most recognized international companies (eBay, Proctor & Gamble, McKinsey & Co.).

Now she invests in new ideas and nurtures innovation as a General Partner in Real Ventures, a venture capital firm.

The Derry Lecture

Janet is passionate about individual potential and the power of entrepreneurship. She has a global perspective on how initiative and inspiration come together to create new opportunities. Excelling in fields and arenas typically dominated by men, Janet understands the challenges of the contemporary world.

Her story and her perspectives inform and motivate.

Janet Bannister

Janet Bannister

And now she’s coming to the University of Guelph to give The Derry Lecture. You should attend!

Wednesday December 2, 2015; 5:00-6:30pm
Rozanski Hall, Room 102
University of Guelph

Tickets are free but please register:

Eventbrite - The Derry Lecture: a Conversation with Janet Bannister, Tech LeaderSee you there!


Posted in Digital Culture, Leadership, UofGuelph | Leave a comment

A Reconsideration

Old fart. Clearly out of touch. Relic. Delusional. Has-been. Irrelevant.


Robert Frost.

It was 1961 and I was a news junkie in-training. So I watched the JFK inauguration. And Frost famously read a poem as part of the ceremony. He stumbled over the piece he had written for the occasion and ended up reciting another piece, “The Gift Outright”, from memory. Apparently it was a charming moment filled with pathos and expectation.

Robert Frost

Robert Frost

But it didn’t matter to me. This was an old, white haired fart who seemed out of it and he was reciting …. well, crap.

Later as my interest in poetry grew and I read lots of it and took lots of poetry classes, Frost shows up again and again. “Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Evening” “Birches”, and of course “The Road Not Taken” over and over and over. Still crap IMHO.

Until last week.

David Orr’s The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong (2015) made me revisit Frost and especially that famous poem.

There is a craft in his work I completely missed. In the apparent simplicity (“superficiality” in my previous judgement), I missed the complexity. There are challenging, even vexing ideas couched in simple words, quietly jarring the meaning. Layers I was too unskilled to see and reluctant to explore.

David Orr, The Road Not TakenIt seems clear Frost the person was self-aggrandizing and unlikable. He wrote his own epitaph (“I had a lover’s quarrel with the world”). It’s a great line but even better marketing for a poet trying to solidify his own high opinion of himself.

But the poems. Or at least some of them.

You must …. Slow. Down. To. Read. Frost. If you are like me, you must forgive what seems like an archaic format and voice. You must give him a chance.

You know the poem, you might know the way it is typically misunderstood. Orr will convince you the misunderstanding is deliberate. And that’s when the crap becomes extraordinary.

Damn that old fart.


The Road Not Taken       

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

Posted in Poetry | 2 Comments

The Book Course

Teaching is like walking a tightrope. When it works (i.e. balance, risk-taking, new vistas), it is amazing. When it doesn’t (missteps, off-kilter, too safe, closed perspective), things don’t end well.

Gutenberg to Gaga to Gone

The Book: From Gutenberg to Gaga to Gone?

I’ve just wrapped up work on a course I taught this fall – The Book: From Gutenberg to Gaga to Gone? It’s one of Guelph’s First Year Seminar courses: 18 first year students; problem-based, experiential learning; too much fun.

However, every other week I thought, yikes, I’m slipping; the tightrope is too long, too narrow, too high. And then it comes together again. My balance is regained and the students are on track and eager to move forward.

I know its my responsibility to design the course and insist on the rigour necessary for true, reflective learning. I also know I need to trust the students. When I do, they rise to the challenge almost every time.

The students contributed to a blog throughout the semester. While they were obligated to do so (yes, they were marked on their submissions), I was impressed with the personal reflections and insights. Their posts inspire me. The students are still at the early stages of their learning journey but it is clear they are going to have quite the ride.


One of the wonderful things we did as a class was visit Coach House Books (thanks Alana Wilcox!). One of the students, Emmali Branton took this lovely picture of me walking into the building.

Mike at Coach House Books

Mike at Coach House Books (photo by Emmali Branton)

Posted in Teaching & Learning | Leave a comment

Montreal Massacre; December 6, 1989

I remember.

Montreal Massacre December 6, 1989

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Punctuation Deficit?

Are we punctuation deprived? Yes, we have all the usual suspects:

. , ! ‘ ? ;

and others (including the : that began the list).

But does it seem like enough?

BTW I’m no expert on this. A friend once gave me a box of commas (thanks Peter) and said “Use them, but use them judiciously.” Apparently I was ignoring the little buggers.

Language usage and typography are always evolving. No matter what the purists say, it’s neither good nor bad. It just is.

So, I’m here to lament the loss of a perfectly good piece of punctuation. Let me explain.

When someone says something particularly outrageous and we want to respond with incredulity we are inclined to utter “Say what?”

Actually we want to utter is “Say what?!” A question AND an exclamation.

But ?! seems weird when you write it out. So, I present to you the interrobang:

InterrobangYes, two birds, one punctuation mark. An interrobang.

The symbol is still deep in Unicode, the Apple OS X, and other mysterious places. But it isn’t readily available on a keyboard near you. It has been ostracized, banished, or perhaps just forgotten. Too bad.

My campaign to return the interrobang to common usage begins now. Think of the possibilities:

You want me to do what Interrobang

Justin Bieber holds 6 Guinness World Records Interrobang

Kelp is good for you Interrobang

As you can tell, the moment for an interrobang revival is well overdue.

Many thanks to George Walker, the extraordinary book artist, for alerting me to this wonderful device. If you don’t know George’s work, stop reading this now and check out his website.

What’s keeping you Interrobang


Posted in Information | 2 Comments


PongI quite dislike nostalgia. All that looking in the rear view view with rose coloured glasses bothers me. The good old days …. weren’t.

So I was surprised by a wave of nostalgia that washed over me a few days ago. Nostalgia for a video game. For Pong.

I blame Walter Isaacson’s The Innovators. It’s a highly recommended survey of the key people responsible for the digital age. It also has a short section on Atari and, of course, Pong.

Here’s how Wikipedia describes Pong:

… a two-dimensional sports game that simulates table tennis. The player controls an in-game paddle by moving it vertically across the left side of the screen, and can compete against either a computer-controlled opponent or another player controlling a second paddle on the opposing side. Players use the paddles to hit a ball back and forth. The aim is for each player to reach eleven points before the opponent; points are earned when one fails to return the ball to the other.

Hi-tech it ain’t. No MMORPG or MMOG here. And so why did I play it for hours and hours. Why did I drop a small fortune (for a teenager) into this arcade machine. Simple answer:


At the time I was dating my future spouse. We had no money and lots of time. We played Pong. At the mall. Endlessly.

I’m starting to feel all warm and fuzzy again.

If you want to try out Pong yourself (or simply wallow in nostalgia like me) try the web simulation. Fun.

Now back to our regularly scheduled posts about information technology, higher education, and other such serious stuff.


Posted in AboutMike, Digital Culture | 2 Comments