A Few Thoughts on the Closing of the DFO Libraries

DFOThere has been lots of commentary, discussion, and outrage on the closing of various DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans) libraries and the disposition of their collections. At this point there are some key facts I don’t fully know or understand, so I’m still weighing the evidence and the validity of these actions.

However, I do know this:

Weeding libraries and pulping the material is not wrong; librarians do it almost every day and it is a very important part of their job.

Closing libraries is not wrong; librarians do it frequently and it is a very important part of their profession.

Collections, and the libraries that support them have life spans, and their relevance waxes and wanes. They are also, for the most part, not unique (this is especially true now that many collections are digital). Much of the DFO collections are available in many other libraries and available either digitally, through inter-library loan, or on-site visits.

So librarians must weed collections and they must close libraries when both actions recognize their diminishing value. This is not a reason to be concerned. Aside from convenience (i.e. the library in my building or on my side of the campus has closed), the larger mandate of preserving access is still sustained because the librarian (again a key part of their job) has assured that the truly unique and relevant material is preserved in another manner.

And here’s where my concern rests.

All the noise and angst over the collections being discarded and the libraries being closed has obscured for me the disposition of material that was unique (i.e. rare and worthy of extraordinary effort to sustain) from that which is simply important (but available elsewhere). Not everything that is unique is worthy of preservation.

Perhaps I should know this, but I don’t. Until I do I’m not ready to pass judgment.

I do wish the librarians at the front lines of this, the DFO librarians and the librarians at LAC (who have a legislative responsibility for federal libraries), would say something about this (and perhaps they have and I’ve missed it).

Weeding libraries: good.

Closing libraries: that’s OK too; under the appropriate circumstances.

Losing unique and valuable research materials: bad; indefensible; not what librarians do.


This entry was posted in Librarianship, Libraries. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to A Few Thoughts on the Closing of the DFO Libraries

  1. Ross Gordon says:

    Thank you for this Michael. We have been consolidating old collections into newer, smaller spaces for years now…at the Request of our clients, who want more desktop access to information resources. We still have seven operational libraries. It has been a very careful process, over five years.

    Yet to read the news, all government science libraries have been dumping books without concience.
    This is not true, all material weeded is done so via the same strict criteria that any library would use and Library and Archives Canada must give approval.

  2. kae Elgie says:

    Maybe the librarians are constrained from commenting.
    It’s not so long ago that federal librarians were dissuaded from attending conferences or making public statements.

  3. Kae Elgie says:

    There is an interesting article in this week’s Rabble about this, from John Dupuis, Science Librarian at York University.
    He agrees with your contention that weeding and consolidation and downsizing are not, by themselves, bad things, but his other comments do not bring comfort.

  4. Pingback: The Canadian War on Science: A chronological account of chaos & consolidation at the Department of Fisheries & Oceans libraries – Confessions of a Science Librarian

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *